2,000 Watt Society

Scientists in Switzerland, a country that imports 80% of its energy, have come up with a cohesive strategy to tackle today’s persistent energy squandering — the “2,000 Watt Society”.

A watt is a unit of power that indicates the rate at which we are using energy. At present, the average European uses around 6,000 watts, compared to 12,000 W in the United States, 1,500 W in China and 300 W in Bangladesh. An average Swiss currently uses 5,000 W.

The concept, developed in 1998 by the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETHZ), sets a target of 2,000 watts per person. In the long run, this means to reduce energy consumption by two thirds in Switzerland.

The need for such urgent action on energy efficiency is verified by the latest World Energy Outlook that estimates a 45% increase in CO2 emissions from the energy sector by 2030. This would cause global temperatures to rise another 6 degrees by the end of the century.

Is a 2,000 watt society feasible?

The concept aims to achieve an average use of 2 kW by the year 2050 without compromising living standards and mobility. This will not be easy. The concept has been extensively covered in the media, and with regard to its long-term orientation some commentators suggested it is a utopian, rather than a realistic vision.

However, “the necessary technology already exists,” says Moritz Leuenberger, head of the Swiss Federal Department of Environment, at the EU G8 Energy Efficiency Conference in 2007.

“The difficulty in enforcing these standards has nothing to do with technologies. The necessary political will has to exist in order to ensure that this vision can be turned into reality, i.e., implementation plans, energy-efficiency programmes, promotion of the concept of the zero-energy house, heat pumps, biogas, low-consumption cars, hybrid vehicles, and so on. It is our political responsibility to translate this concept into practice.”

Changes for sustainability

Such a holistic approach to an energy efficient society addresses all realms of social, economic and political life. A study conducted at the ETHZ highlights the drastic implications of such a transition.

Fundamental changes would be required in the building sector where solar passive houses and zero-emission buildings are already well advanced. Another area with the largest savings potential is road transport and freight logistics, the efficiency of which can be increased with the use of fuel cell cars and advanced telematics.

However, the most significant change will have to occur in human behavior. Residential energy use has multiplied in recent decades as income and consumption rise and lifestyle changes have added to the number of dwellings, not to mention energy eating appliances.

We know that material acquisition (read: resource use) in developed, and increasingly in developing countries, constitutes a primary indicator of individual social status. People begin to satisfy more psychological desires than physical needs, as they move up the social spectrum — goods once out of reach become day-to-day entitlements. Such behaviour is deeply rooted in consumer societies and the driving forces for excessive household energy consumption.

Any strategy towards a 2,000 Watt Society requires a fundamental change in social norms, values and practices, together with a new innovation system (research policy, education, standards, incentives etc.) as part of a national policy on sustainable development.

An urban laboratory

In 2001 the ETHZ together with two Swiss Federal agencies, research institutions, local authorities, companies and private partners initiated the program Novatlantis to demonstrate how the vision of a 2,000 Watt Society can be turned into reality. In the city centre of Basel, a picturesque metropolis of approximately 200,000 in northwestern Switzerland, four major urban development projects will be fully based on energy efficient technologies, renewable energy supply, clean mobility systems and sustainable lifestyle concepts.

Several zero-heating energy buildings are projected for Swiss corporations, and public buildings like a Zurich 2,000 Watt hospital are being developed. The Forum Chriesbach complex, the headquarters of the Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and a standard-setting zero emissions building, utilizes daylight and rainwater and maintains a constant temperature without requiring air conditioning in all seasons.

Through an “experimental space mobility” project, the feasibility and acceptability of clean energy vehicles and public transportation based on natural gas is being tested. The research findings of such projects are constantly shared in a network of public and private stakeholders and investors that ensure profitability.

Other cities like Zurich and the Geneva region have already caught up and benefited from the research network. Ultimately, these cities are expected to transfer the know-how gained in Basel and implement their own urban 2,000 Watt development projects.

Energy policy is climate policy

The vision of a 2,000 Watt Society requires significant and fully integrated investments in new technologies, urban development and scientific research — financial and economic decisions few governments to date have been willing to take. Hardly surprising that energy efficiency in most countries has improved by less than 1% annually in recent years and is widely surpassed by the increase in energy use, due to cheap oil.

However, as the energy sector accounts for 60% of greenhouse gases, energy efficiency plays the most significant role in tackling climate change.

“Energy policy is the same as climate change policy,” noted the International Energy Agency’s director Nobuo Tanaka at last month’s Energy Efficiency Global Forum in Paris. These words might well sum up the most important messages at the conference: The need as well as the opportunity to scale up energy efficiency has never been greater than today.

Creative Commons License
2,000 Watt Society by Kalle Huebner is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at http://ourworld.unu.edu/en/2000-watt-society/.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION BELOW

Author

Kalle Huebner graduated with a M.A. in Political Science and Slavic Studies from the University of Leipzig in Germany. Currently he is working as an intern at the United Nations University Institute for Sustainability and Peace (ISP) and receives the Carlo Schmid scholarship from the German Academic Exchange Service. He is interested in development strategies, political ethics and sustainable living.

Join the Discussion

  • bob alexander

    Details are lacking in this article. It does not tell how the Swiss are trying to achieve this goal. The 2000 watt calculation is not defined either. There appears to be an energy generation offset inlcuded for solar collectors but the details of that are not included either. In such a short non technical treatise one would not expect such details. Geothermal heating and cooling is available everywhere on the globe except in permafrost regions, only a few feet down. By installing pumps, heat exchangers and air handlers most of the world can save half or more of there energy use this way. By downsizing vehicles and organizing cities differently to minimize transportation another large segment of energy consumption can be reduced. This is much easier to do in compact areas than in those suburban environments where sprawl has the people far removed from the products and services they require. More local gardening can also be a boon to energy conservation if the waste products are composted and used in the garden. Plug in cars and just reducing the miles driven are another good way to do this. If everyone were to do just some of these things fossil fuel use could be halved.

  • David Thompson

    I agree with Bob Alexander. My own house in Southern California – 2400 sq ft, about 30 years old, air conditioning, swimming pool and koi pond was using around 1250 kw per month (about 40 per day). We added a 5kw solar photovoltaic system and now use about 150 kw per month in the winter and are at net zero the rest of the year. Easy and affordable given the rebates and tax credits.

  • Anthony Maturin

    Technofixes are all very fine, but they illustrate and reinforce the thinking coming from societies which seem not to realise the life situations of probably the majority of our world’s population. And there is the danger.

    Consider – it seems we are inevitably heading for a four degree world, in which the lands between say, NZ in the south and northern Spain in the north, will be largely incapable of sustaining human life – though they may be used in other ways. What have the present crop of technofixes to do with either, a) making life possible in those soon to be abandoned lands and so at least modifying the migrations of many millions of climate refugees, or b) coping with life in a vastly densely populated country? Violence and anarchy I suggest will be bigger problems than maintaining present hedonistic lifestyles.

    Anthony Maturin.

  • tt_tiara

    It was not immediately obvious to me that 2000 Watts means 2000 Watts per hour. 2000 Watts/hr. is quite an ambitious goal.

  • NickyFromSales

    tt_tiara: what’s immediately obvious is that you’re confused. 2000 Watts per hour is a RATE of POWER, which makes even less sense than just 2000 Watts (unit of power) which I assume is just a year-averaged RATE of ENERGY consumption.

    2000 W/hr makes sense when your electrical generator is winding up (or winding down), in which case you can say that the power output of the generator is increasing (or decreasing) at the rate of 2000 W/hr.