Give Thanks and Don’t Shop: Buy Nothing Day 2009

Thanksgiving Day falls on 26 November in the United States — the time to express gratitude for a bountiful harvest. That is why it makes great sense for 27 November to be ‘Buy Nothing Day‘.

Some of us are gradually facing up to the reality that those bountiful harvests that nature provides may be in jeopardy. Not necessarily today, for the average middle class American, but certainly for a growing number of people across the planet, not to mention future generations.

One reason for this is simple. Populations in the developed world are addicted to voraciously over-consuming and the impact of this insatiable appetite is global. But, as this CNN interview with Buy Nothing Day organiser Kalle Lasn makes clear, not everyone agrees that over-consumption is a problem.

Lasn: “Over-consumption has ecological consequences… over-consumption is, in some sense, the mother of all our environmental problems.”

CNN: “Oh, c’mon, environmental problems?”

Peak shopping

Yes, environmental problems — from the quality of our air, loss of our forests and over-exploitation of our oceans, to our supply of oil, water, fertile land and minerals. The mounting evidence of peak everything reminds us that the high impact lifestyles of the richest one billion people are unsustainable (consuming 86% of the goods in the global market place). These could have potentially dire consequences for all 6.7 billion of us.

Buy Nothing Day aims to raise awareness about the impacts of our purchases. It asks us to give our relentless consumer lifestyles a rest and for just 24 hours, buy nothing. Is that too much to ask?

Lasn’s interview on CNN suggests that it may well be too much to ask. It may well be too much to hear as well. The mainstream corporate media has a knee jerk reaction to such requests. Lasn takes this issue up from the outset in his interview, which began with CNN showing the 2007 campaign ad:

Lasn:  “I should point out that the ad you just saw, we were not able to buy any airtime on MTV, FOX, ABC, NBC or CBS for that ad.”

CNN:  “Well, why do you think that is?”

Lasn:  “Because I think that they want to generate as much consumption as they can during the Christmas shopping season and they don’t like dissenting voices like this coming on.”

CNN:  “No, we make our money off of advertising so we want the money too.”

With corporate media conglomerates having such a huge stake in the consumption machine, why would they want it to stop? Why would they want to spread this message? All credit to CNN for giving Lasn the airtime. If only other TV channels were brave enough to promote the “stop shopping” banner and risk the ire of sponsors (scroll down towards the bottom of this page to hear the reasons given by certain networks for rejecting the Buy Nothing Day ads).

Buying ‘buy nothing’

This year marks the 17th anniversary of the Buy Nothing Day campaign, which started in Canada in 1992 and has now gone global. It takes place on 27 November in North America, and 28 November in another 65 countries, with campaigns in Argentina, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Romania, Sweden and here in Japan.

The 2009 campaign advertisement gives a solemn message about many of the problems faced by people in the US. This post-recession message contrasts with the provocative 2007 campaign advertisement which portrayed consumers as overfed pigs. But is, as the CNN anchor rightly asks, portraying consumers as pigs an effective way to stop people buying so much?

Lasn believe it is and argues;

“So today, in the United States of America, when millions of people were going and shopping like crazy, there were a few million other people around the world who didn’t buy a single thing.”

The CNN anchor suggested an alternative marketing strategy for the campaign:

“Maybe if you said ‘Well, the holiday season is meant to be with your family, the sharing of generosity and love and not consumerism’, maybe that would work better.”

This might make sense, since the tradition of thanksgiving draws upon these very aspirations. Unfortunately, the original meaning of thanksgiving seems to be melting away in the shopping frenzy that is the holiday season.

‘Buy, Buy, Buy’ Day

In the US, the Friday after Thanksgiving is called Black Friday. It is the start of the Christmas shopping season — and has now become a culturally entrenched, family shopping tradition. This is the time when retailers are looking for a major increase in their sales, especially in this period of economic downturn.

For the CNN anchor and perhaps many other people, not buying on this day, the day deliberately targeted by the campaign, would be “so hard to believe…I mean Black Friday is like a tradition, people love to go out on this day and shop”.

So would buying nothing destroy the American economy as we know it, as the CNN host asks? This is the most common argument presented against consuming less. If we don’t consume, we will break the economy. People need to be convinced that the economy would work just fine with less consumption.

Lasn’s response is that consuming less used to be the norm. Throughout most of our history, we have been far more frugal than we are today and the economy ticked over just fine. Maybe we need to relearn some of the old ways of doing things. In fact, with rising energy and food prices now and even higher prices in the not too distant future, being frugal could make you more resilient towards shocks that can occur when you over extend beyond your credit limit.

Unfortunately, in recovering from the 2008 financial crisis through huge government bailouts, many national economies have missed out on a superb opportunity to reorient their societies towards sustainable lifestyles and perhaps ultimately a more sustainable economic model.

The real question should be, is an economy built upon over-consumption and consumers with maxed-out credit cards worth keeping?

After all, even if we ignore the ecological consequences as the mainstream media would have as do, as Lasn points out, our happiness levels have not gone up anyway.

Buy Nothing Day events will take place in over 60 countries on 27 November (North America) and 28 November (internationally).

Creative Commons License
Give Thanks and Don’t Shop: Buy Nothing Day 2009 by Brendan Barrett is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION BELOW

Authors

Brendan Barrett

Brendan Barrett joined the United Nations University in 1997. His professional career includes work in the private sector, academia and with international organizations. He uses the web and information technologies as a means to communicate, teach and undertake research on issues of environment and human security.

Mark Notaras was a writer/editor of Our World for the United Nations University (UNU) from 2009-2012. He is a former researcher in Peace and Security for the UNU Institute for Sustainability and Peace. He holds a Masters in International Affairs (Peace and Conflict Studies) from the Australian National University and the Peace Research Institute, Oslo and in 2013 completed a Rotary Peace Fellowship at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok. Currently Mark works in Timor-Leste advising local NGOs on community agriculture and conflict prevention projects.

Join the Discussion

  • http://www.ourworld.unu.edu/ Carol S

    The debate on over-consumption has only just begun, I suspect. I’m personally one that has felt comfortable in this Age of New Austerity, having frugality programmed into me by my hardscrabble youth, and I today firmly believe that there is no economic (nor rational) justification for rich societies to continue to over-consume.

    When it comes to Christmas, while I do enjoy the spirit of giving, I have for several years tended to make my own cards (recycling past years’ cards and paper) and even gifts, and honestly prefer to receive homemade things myself (so get cracking there, Mark!).

    On the topic, I’ve yet to read it but I thoroughly agree with the premise of a new book, entitled Scroogenomics (http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8972.html) that shows how our consumer spending generates vast amounts of economic waste. Further, the dollars spent on gifts produce 18% less satisfaction per dollar than dollars the receiver would spend on themselves.

    Only 27 creating days left till Christmas: time to get busy!

  • http://www.ourworld.unu.edu/ Carol S

    The debate on over-consumption has only just begun, I suspect. I’m personally one that has felt comfortable in this Age of New Austerity, having frugality programmed into me by my hardscrabble youth, and I today firmly believe that there is no economic (nor rational) justification for rich societies to continue to over-consume.

    When it comes to Christmas, while I do enjoy the spirit of giving, I have for several years tended to make my own cards (recycling past years’ cards and paper) and even gifts, and honestly prefer to receive homemade things myself (so get cracking there, Mark!).

    On the topic, I’ve yet to read it but I thoroughly agree with the premise of a new book, entitled Scroogenomics (http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8972.html) that shows how our consumer spending generates vast amounts of economic waste. Further, the dollars spent on gifts produce 18% less satisfaction per dollar than dollars the receiver would spend on themselves.

    Only 27 creating days left till Christmas: time to get busy!

  • Ainius L

    These days as humanity becomes more and more urbanized, we increasingly lose touch with our traditional celebrations. Agricultural and astronomical cycles, which once were at the core of almost every festival, now end up being just shopping cycles.

  • christopherdoll

    The issue of urbanisation is an important and interesting one. Sociologists point to two negative effects of urbanisation and consumption. One is that cities are theatres of consumption. From pervasive advertising to the multiplier effect of having more people to display your possessions to.

    The second is known as dematerialisation and our urban experience is particularly good at breaking the link between what we consume and where it comes from. From food to other goods, we fit what we use to the environment around us rather than than considering where it came from.

    Maybe better labelling of goods to indicate what actually it takes to make something would help but the idea mentioned above that we have shifted from celebrating production (harvest festivals) have morphed into celebrating consumption is a pertinent one.
    Thanksgiving gives way to Black Friday.