Harvest Time in Satoyama

For many Japanese, satoyama represents the ideal of coexistence between humans and nature. It is commonly described as secondary woodlands and grasslands adjunct to small villages, and is the scene of rich biological diversity.

The first written reference to satoyama dates back to 1759. Forester Hyoemon Terauchi recorded the livelihoods of rural mountain woodland communities and used the term satoyama to describe the human managed landscapes surrounding those communities.

The idea of satoyama — along with the views about nature, lifestyles, cultural values, traditional knowledge and resource management practices it embodies — would have faded into the annals of history were it not for the efforts of another forester ecologist, Tsunahide Shidei, who reintroduced this concept in the 1960s.

Shidei’s revival of satoyama was partly a counter reaction to the chemical fertilizer revolution of the time and the impact rapid economic development was having on the social, cultural and natural landscapes of Japan.

Open to many interpretations

Satoyama has since evolved and is now used in differing contexts. Among neo-traditional conservationists, satoyama often broadly refers to traditional rural landscapes and has become for many a symbol of terrain where humans and nature coexist in a symbiotic relationship.

For ecologists exploring habitat modification and human use of natural landscapes, the satoyama concept has evolved to include cultivated lands (farmlands), and reservoirs (including natural wetlands and traditional man-made irrigation ponds called tameike); all elements linked together as part of the traditional agricultural land use system of Japan.

Interest in the satoyama landscape and its recognition as an example of a sustainable system have spread beyond conservation ecology circles to include policy makers and citizens concerned with the socio-cultural and environmental impacts of contemporary lifestyles.

This growing interest is reflective of the gradual shift in focus of the nature conservation movement. Where once there was an emphasis specifically on conserving designated protected zones, there is now recognition that human intervention is an integral element.

A changing landscape

Landscape transformation often mirrors socio-economic changes. Questions of transformation and transition frequently weave through satoyama discussions.

How have satoyama landscapes been altered as Japan has gone from an agrarian society, sustained by locally managed and produced bioresources, to an industrialized urban society dependant on imported fossil fuels and associated products?

According to leading satoyama landscape ecologists Kazuhiko Takeuchi, Izumi Washitani and colleagues — who introduced satoyama to English literature  — the fuel and fertilizer revolutions of the 1960s led to two distinctive patterns of degradation.

Satoyama landscapes disappeared as urban sprawl and large scale development changed the traditional rural landscapes.  Conversely, in rural areas far from expanding cities, depopulation coupled with ageing of the residents has resulted in the  abandonment of  secondary woodland and farmland and the ensuing underuse of bioresources.

Food and fuel

Environmental degradation through the lens of satoyama landscapes has also drawn attention to the food and fuel debate in Japan.

In 1950, 45.5% of the labour force was involved in agriculture. It has since shrunk to 7%, approximately 60% of whom are over 65 years of age, and the agricultural industry now accounts for a mere 1.3% of the GDP.

In the most food import-dependant country among industrialized nations — Japan’s food self-sufficiency rate having dropped to 39% — land use, resource management and the fragile state of food and fuel security is of growing concern.

In the fall of 2008, the Japanese government took the issue to the people. Of those polled, 93% expressed concern over current food self-sufficiency rates and the need to increase production capacity so as to reduce dependency on food imports.

One in two people believed rural communities to be important not only in providing food for the nation, but also for their role in resource conservation management and ensuring species diversity in rural landscapes.

When asked about future agricultural policies, close to 70% of those polled expressed the need for policies that address depopulation, ageing and undermanagement of bioresources in rural communities.

Raising awareness

Gradually increasing public awareness of the links between satoyama landscapes and food and fuel security is a welcome trend among researchers involved in satoyama ecosystem assessments.

In 2006, the United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS) initiated a comprehensive national ecosystem assessment focusing on satoyama. Referred to as the Satoyama-Satoumi Sub-Global Assessment, it is intended to be part of the network of over 30 sub-global ecosystem assessments. To ensure an in-depth report, Japan was broken down into 5 clusters (one of which is the Hoku-Shinetsu Cluster and the work of UNU-IAS Operating Unit Ishikawa/Kanazawa featured in the video).

Focusing on the last 50 years of satoyama landscape change, each cluster report follows the framework of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. The findings will be integrated into a national report to be published in time for the 10th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity in October 2010 in Nagoya, Japan.

Many of the writers assessing the ecosystem services provided by satoyama landscapes hope that their findings will feed into designs for a sustainable society that draw from the past to forge a contemporary model for sustainability; a model that contributes not only to sustainable food and fuel production but also to biodiversity conservation strategies and initiatives in Japan.

Creative Commons License
Harvest time in satoyama by Mio Horiuchi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at http://ourworld.unu.edu/en/harvest-time-in-satoyama/.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION BELOW

Authors

Mio Horiuchi, Programme Associate, holds a Masters degree and a PhD in Agriculture from the Graduate School of Agriculture, University of Kyoto.

Her doctoral thesis focused on the formation of satoyama landscapes. As a Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), she completed a post-doctoral thesis based on research in the agricultural and forestry communities in the Lake Biwa region. She is currently involved in landscape ecology research in the Hokuriku region and leads the OUIK coordinating team for the Hoku-Shinetsu Cluster Satoyama Satoumi Sub-Global Assessment.

Toshiya Kai, Programme Associate, holds an MSc from the London School of Economics and a BA from the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 

Based in Ishikawa prefecture, he works with regional government officials and researchers to coordinate research related to satoyama.

Anne McDonald

Professor Sophia University

Anne McDonald is a Professor in the Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies at Sophia University in Tokyo. She was formerly the Director of the UNU Institute of Advanced Studies, Operating Unit Ishikawa/Kanazawa and has been involved in agricultural and fishing community-related field research in Japan since the late 1980s. She has been a member of the Japanese national government’s committee for promoting environmentally sound agricultural practices since 1994, worked with the Japanese Ministry of Environment (MoEJ) government review team for the IPCC 3rd and 4th Assessment Reports, and is a member of the first national strategy committee for biodiversity for the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF). She is also a member of both national and regional government committees established in 2008 to explore satoyama policy initiatives.

Join the Discussion

  • RawatYS

    A great initiative towards Satoyama !

  • Jennifer Martin

    This video points out fundamental issues such as sustainability and self sufficiency which are issues that nations around the world, even here in Canada, need to address. One of the largest problems here in Canada was pointed out as being an issue in Japan: Children that grow up in rural areas often leave in search of better paying jobs or a life with broader opportunities. In turn this leaves farms and ranches without enough manpower to work the land. Also, due to fluctuating markets there is no yearly income guarentee, this often scares away the younger generation that is considering the cost of supporting a family. The challenge is to make farming both profitable and enticing to the younger generations, so that they will be encouraged to stay or return to the rural landscape.

  • kevinscollon

    An compelling video. I find it quite interesting that we find ourself looking backwards to what has been done from a sustainability point of view and now look forward to recreating that system again. I agree with the previous comment that while most people pay lip service to saving the planet and doing what is right, it is so much easier to live the life we now lead. In Canada we can buy red peppers from New Zealand! How ridiculous is that. The ground swell of support for such concepts is slow. Initiatives like the 100 mile diet serve to support local producers and provide a customer base for the products. Education is key to all these concepts.

  • leianneanderson

    The video show how beautiful  the land is in Japan and how they care about what happens to it. The older people are worried about wyat will happen when they can’t work anymore and people are working to try and  make farming more attractive to younger people. It makes me wonder what will happen in Canada, could we have the same probllems? I see so many students at university going into business, especially foreign students, maybe we should be working on sustainability problems.

  • Derek Hanna

    Harvest time in satoyama is an amazing video and article on the rural areas of Japan. Presenting the  loss and low self-sufficiency in agriculture, which is greatly interesting. With a little research, their efforts don’t seem to be ‘reaching out’ that much(“In March 2000, the agricultural ministry set a goal of raising food self sufficiency to 45 percent by 2010, but it has since pushed back the target to 2015.” 2008 article). The video and written description talks about what seems to be a problem in many rural areas dealing with agriculture. How the older generations are being left to tend to the farms, while the youth go off and abandon their farming roots. Overall this presents an interesting case for satoyama and the agriculture of Japan.

  • Tiffany_Rivette

    This video is very interesting.  It is unfortunate that farms are shutting down due to lack of manpower.   No matter how attractive a city may be it can never compete with the fresh air and stunning landscapes of more remote regions.  It is sad that the beautiful Satoyama are being abandoned for city living.   All over the world machines have been replacing people in the farming industry.  In Canada the farming industry uses a much less traditional approach.  Farms are mostly run by a few farmers and a great deal of machines.  Locally grown produce is very popular because it is usually less expensive than imported produce, it is fresher, and it is less likely to be damaged in transport.  Hopefully Japan can solve this problem of sustainability.

  • Carly

    This story touched me emotionally. What a great example of the dynamic social change happening within the modern world. It is sad that the youth in Japan do not want to take on the traditional lifestyle found within Satoyama. I hope new policies and subsideis will encourage growth of Satoyama communitites in the future. Thank you. Carly.

  • Will Plommer

    The concept of Satoyama is comparable to the agricultural land reserve (ALR) in British Columbia which holds suitable land for agricultural purposes. Very little of British Columbia is conducive to agricultural production, so the ALR was put into place in order to protect these areas. Since its instalment, the rules surrounding what can be done with land classified by the ALR have continued to be transformed. For example, golf courses are allowed to be constructed under special circumstances on these lands. Sometimes this can serve both purposes, as in the orchards of Kelowna where a golf course was constructed, with the orchard continuing to provide fruits as the apple trees were not cut down. However, in the Lower Mainland, where most of the agriculturally productive lands are located, urban development and sprawl threatens their protection. The loss of suitable agricultural lands in British Columbia has also coincided with increases in imported vegetables and fruits. Surprisingly, we export most of our apples and import these fruits from other countries, even Washington state! In efforts to combat climatic change, much of the Okanagan orchards have been transformed to vineyards (for wine and ice wine), resulting in further losses of food crops. Interestingly enough, changes to the ALR in BC are likely to come again:

    http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Minister+promises+wide+consultation+before+changes/9768833/story.html

    In contrast to the situation of Satoyama, where depopulation by young people and an aging population are occurring, the changes being proposed to the ALR in BC are thought to give the older generation economic opportunities. As a result, these older folks may stay on their properties for longer due to their new economic boost.

  • Celia Gong

    This video demonstrates the depopulation and aging issues are resulting the abandonment of farm work in Satoyama. It reminds me of what is happening in China’s rural areas now.

    To make money to support daily lives, millions of young people are leaving their rural villages to modern cities, such as Beijing, Guangzhou, etc. As a result, they may earn money to send back home so that their elder parent without great work capability do not need to work in farmlands.

    Consequently, it causes the same problem just like the example in Satoyama. The amount of labor force has declined which led to the shrink of agriculture production. What is more, many rich farmlands has been abandoned because of the aging issues in some rural areas. And the situation is getting worse and worse. To solve the problems, China’ government adopted some policies to promote the farm work, and it is playing a little bit.

  • Yang Can

    Really love this video.