Biodiversity

For many Japanese, satoyama represents the ideal of coexistence between humans and nature. It is commonly described as secondary woodlands and grasslands adjunct to small villages, and is the scene of rich biological diversity.

The first written reference to satoyama dates back to 1759. Forester Hyoemon Terauchi recorded the livelihoods of rural mountain woodland communities and used the term satoyama to describe the human managed landscapes surrounding those communities.

The idea of satoyama — along with the views about nature, lifestyles, cultural values, traditional knowledge and resource management practices it embodies — would have faded into the annals of history were it not for the efforts of another forester ecologist, Tsunahide Shidei, who reintroduced this concept in the 1960s.

Shidei’s revival of satoyama was partly a counter reaction to the chemical fertilizer revolution of the time and the impact rapid economic development was having on the social, cultural and natural landscapes of Japan.

Open to many interpretations

Satoyama has since evolved and is now used in differing contexts. Among neo-traditional conservationists, satoyama often broadly refers to traditional rural landscapes and has become for many a symbol of terrain where humans and nature coexist in a symbiotic relationship.

For ecologists exploring habitat modification and human use of natural landscapes, the satoyama concept has evolved to include cultivated lands (farmlands), and reservoirs (including natural wetlands and traditional man-made irrigation ponds called tameike); all elements linked together as part of the traditional agricultural land use system of Japan.

Interest in the satoyama landscape and its recognition as an example of a sustainable system have spread beyond conservation ecology circles to include policy makers and citizens concerned with the socio-cultural and environmental impacts of contemporary lifestyles.

This growing interest is reflective of the gradual shift in focus of the nature conservation movement. Where once there was an emphasis specifically on conserving designated protected zones, there is now recognition that human intervention is an integral element.

A changing landscape

Landscape transformation often mirrors socio-economic changes. Questions of transformation and transition frequently weave through satoyama discussions.

How have satoyama landscapes been altered as Japan has gone from an agrarian society, sustained by locally managed and produced bioresources, to an industrialized urban society dependant on imported fossil fuels and associated products?

According to leading satoyama landscape ecologists Kazuhiko Takeuchi, Izumi Washitani and colleagues — who introduced satoyama to English literature  — the fuel and fertilizer revolutions of the 1960s led to two distinctive patterns of degradation.

Satoyama landscapes disappeared as urban sprawl and large scale development changed the traditional rural landscapes.  Conversely, in rural areas far from expanding cities, depopulation coupled with ageing of the residents has resulted in the  abandonment of  secondary woodland and farmland and the ensuing underuse of bioresources.

Food and fuel

Environmental degradation through the lens of satoyama landscapes has also drawn attention to the food and fuel debate in Japan.

In 1950, 45.5% of the labour force was involved in agriculture. It has since shrunk to 7%, approximately 60% of whom are over 65 years of age, and the agricultural industry now accounts for a mere 1.3% of the GDP.

In the most food import-dependant country among industrialized nations — Japan’s food self-sufficiency rate having dropped to 39% — land use, resource management and the fragile state of food and fuel security is of growing concern.

In the fall of 2008, the Japanese government took the issue to the people. Of those polled, 93% expressed concern over current food self-sufficiency rates and the need to increase production capacity so as to reduce dependency on food imports.

One in two people believed rural communities to be important not only in providing food for the nation, but also for their role in resource conservation management and ensuring species diversity in rural landscapes.

When asked about future agricultural policies, close to 70% of those polled expressed the need for policies that address depopulation, ageing and undermanagement of bioresources in rural communities.

Raising awareness

Gradually increasing public awareness of the links between satoyama landscapes and food and fuel security is a welcome trend among researchers involved in satoyama ecosystem assessments.

In 2006, the United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS) initiated a comprehensive national ecosystem assessment focusing on satoyama. Referred to as the Satoyama-Satoumi Sub-Global Assessment, it is intended to be part of the network of over 30 sub-global ecosystem assessments. To ensure an in-depth report, Japan was broken down into 5 clusters (one of which is the Hoku-Shinetsu Cluster and the work of UNU-IAS Operating Unit Ishikawa/Kanazawa featured in the video).

Focusing on the last 50 years of satoyama landscape change, each cluster report follows the framework of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. The findings will be integrated into a national report to be published in time for the 10th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity in October 2010 in Nagoya, Japan.

Many of the writers assessing the ecosystem services provided by satoyama landscapes hope that their findings will feed into designs for a sustainable society that draw from the past to forge a contemporary model for sustainability; a model that contributes not only to sustainable food and fuel production but also to biodiversity conservation strategies and initiatives in Japan.

About the authors

Anne McDonald

Anne McDonald, Director of the UNU-IAS OUIK, has been involved in agricultural and fishing community-related field research in Japan since the late 1980s.

Mio Horiuchi

Mio Horiuchi, Programme Associate, holds a Masters degree and a PhD in Agriculture from the Graduate School of Agriculture, University of Kyoto.

Toshiya Kai

Toshiya Kai, Programme Associate, holds an MSc from the London School of Economics and a BA from the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 
This story has been published under a Creative Commons license. To view the full legal license click the banner below.

You are free:

  •  

    to Share - to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work

  •  

    to Remix - to make derivative works

Under the following conditions:

  •  

    Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

  •  

    Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.

  •  

    Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

  • Takashi
    I really enjoyed to read harvest in Satoyama. thanks.
  • Great article! After living in rural Japan for 3 years and seeing these areas every day and all the uses they generate and the feelings that surround them, I can honestly say that they still fascinate me and captivate me like nothing else. I've picnicked in them, picked fruit in them, walked through them, and just soaked in the peace in them. IT would Japan well to save these areas, and further expand them in city areas as the Japanese soul is deeply connected to the land even though most people live in the cities.
  • Zare Ferragi
    This video made me think about a phenomenon called "i turn", which refers to those people born and raised in the cities who decide to migrate to the countryside. Could this represent a change for Satoyama and an example from Japan to be exported to other countries?
  • Dennis Letourneau
    A very well thought out video. Nicely paced and informative, it makes an appealing case for the Satoyama concept as part of the solution to moving Japan (and potentially other nations) towards a sustainable future. To those of us untrained in the social or agricultural sciences the concept appeals to our common sense – a solution from earlier generations to lead us back to a more balanced life and a more balanced planet. The challenge – and this is where many ideas that would benefit mankind inevitably stumble and fall – is in the creation and implementation of effective policies that push us towards this desired behavior. Not having worked in Japan but having worked throughout North America and Southeast Asia I found to my dismay one common theme amongst these different cultures: the relentless pursuit of happiness in the short term by the masses whether or not it benefited their descendants in the long term. The majority of the population on both sides of the Pacific will pay lip service to saving the planet but will only pursue this course of action if it provides immediate financial gain, tangible improvement in quality of life (as they define it) or if the pain of not taking this new course of action exceeds the pain associated with taking it. These motivating factors will also drive many of the elected officials who you will need to pass effective legislation and that legislation itself will have to appeal to the short-term needs of the populace to woo them into doing something for the better good. To dismiss this view as mere skepticism is to fail. To embrace a pragmatic approach that appeals to the short-sightedness and greed of mankind and essentially tricks him into pursuing a sustainable lifestyle is the only way to succeed in truly changing his behavior when he perceives no imminent threat to his existing way of life – otherwise his behavior will only change when the planet literally begins to crumble around him. I’ll wager that most Japanese politicians, farmers and city dwellers do not lay awake at night wondering how to devise a sustainable future for the planet. But when you appeal to their desire to increase their personal quality of life (be it happy constituents and re-election for a politician, steady wages for a farmer or a more balanced life for the city dweller) then you have their attention. To halt and reverse the current migration from the farmlands of Japan to the cities will require legislation that provides immediate, measurable benefits that exceed the perceived benefits of staying put. Likewise, immediate and tangible benefits must reward those who choose to buy locally-grown foods over imported ones. To place one’s faith in mankind to make the wise choice for the good of his fellow man will not suffice in this scenario. Any industry that stands to lose financially from the resurrection of the Satoyama concept (land developers, food importers) will lobby against you and unless you have greater leverage over the legislators than your opponents you will lose to these interest groups (who often will not behave as ethically as you in pursuing their goals). Proponents for the restoration of Satoyama will have to go into this fight with a winning strategy to out-maneuver their opponents and with the means to appeal effectively and overwhelmingly to the basic needs of those they wish to influence into embracing the Satoyama concept. You then stand to succeed where most fail and to make a lasting change that you can be proud of.
  • RawatYS
    A great initiative towards Satoyama !
blog comments powered by Disqus