Oil

Plastic to oil fantastic

by Carol Smith on April 14, 2009

We are all well aware of plastic’s “rap-sheet.” It has been found guilty on many counts, including the way its production and disposal raises resource issues and lets loose extremely negative environmental impacts.

Typically made from petroleum, it is estimated that 7% of the world’s annual oil production is used to produce and manufacture plastic. That is more than the oil consumed by the entire African continent.

Plastic’s carbon footprint includes landfilling and incineration, since sadly, its recycle rate is dismally low around the globe.

Plastic trash is also polluting our oceans and washing up on beaches around the world. Tons of plastic from the US and Japan are floating in the Pacific Ocean, killing mammals and birds. Perhaps this tragedy is best captured in the TED presentation by Capt. Charles Moore of the Algalita Marine Research Foundation.

Using less, or use it better?

Thankfully, there are those who fully appreciate that plastic has a higher energy value than anything else commonly found in the waste stream. A Japanese company called Blest created a small, very safe and easy to use machine that can convert several types of plastic back into oil.

Though Japan has much improved its “effective utilization” rate over the years to 72% in 2006, that leaves 28% of plastic to be buried in landfills or burned. According to Plastic Waste Management Institute data, “effective utilization” includes not just the 20% that is actually recycled, but also 52% that is being incinerated for “energy recovery” purposes, i.e., generating heat or electric power.

“If we burn the plastic, we generate toxins and a large amount of CO2. If we convert it into oil, we save CO2 and at the same time increase people’s awareness about the value of plastic garbage,” says Akinori Ito, CEO of Blest.

Blest’s conversion technology is very safe because it uses a temperature controlling electric heater rather than flame. The machines are able to process polyethylene, polystyrene and polypropylene (numbers 2-4) but not PET bottles (number 1). The result is a crude gas that can fuel things like generators or stoves and, when refined, can even be pumped into a car, a boat or motorbike. One kilogram of plastic produces almost one liter of oil. To convert that amount takes about 1 kilowatt of electricity, which is approximately ¥20 or 20 cents’ worth.

The company makes the machines in various sizes and has 60 in place at farms, fisheries and small factories in Japan and several abroad.

“To make a machine that anyone can use is my dream,” Ito says. “The home is the oil field of the future.”

Perhaps that statement is not as crazy as it sounds, since the makeup of Japanese household waste has been found to contain over 30 % plastic, most of it from packaging.

Breakdown of plastic waste in the average Japanese household
Sources: Kohei Watanabe, Reference material provided for the talk
“Waste and Sustainable Consumption”, Capability and Sustainability Centre,
St Edmund’s College Cambridge, March 2005; Association of Regional Planners
and Architects, Detailed Sorting and Measuring of Household Waste, Kyoto 1998.

Continually honing their technology, the company is now able to sell the machines for less than before, and Ito hopes to achieve a product “that any one can buy.” Currently the smallest version, shown in the videobrief, costs ¥950,000 (US $9,500).

Changing how we think

But it is the educational application of the small model of the machine that Ito is most passionate about. He’s taken it on planes on many occasions as part of a project that began some years ago in the Marshall Islands. There he worked with local government and schools to teach people about recycling culture and the value of discarded plastic, spreading the Japanese concept of mottainai, the idea that waste is sad and regrettable.

In such remote places, the machine also serves as a practical solution to the plastic problem, much of it left behind by tourists: the oil produced is used for tour buses or boats, Ito says.

“Teaching this at schools is the most important work that I do,” Ito reflects. In Japan too, he visits schools where he shows children, teachers and parents how to convert the packaging and drinking straws leftover from lunch.

If we were to use only the world’s plastic waste rather than oil from oil fields, CO2 emissions could be slashed dramatically, he says.

“It’s a waste isn’t it?” Ito asks. “This plastic is every where in the world, and everyone throws it away.”

A mountain to climb down

The wonderful invention of plastics has spawned a huge problem that we are struggling to solve. With peak oil looming, things are set to change, but we find ourselves on top of an oil and plastic mountain, and the only way forward is down.

So while many solutions like this are not without hiccups or detractors, they are a step forward in coming to terms with our oil and plastics dependence and help raise awareness of the carbon footprint of its production and use. Somehow we all know that plastics is a habit we need to kick. But that doesn’t seem to make it any easier.

Perhaps the best thing you can do is to look more deeply into this issue. A good place to start is the 2008 Addicted to Plastic documentary from Cryptic Moth productions. You can watch the trailer online and maybe request it at your local video rental store.

According to the blurb, “the film details plastic’s path over the last 100 years and provides a wealth of expert interviews on practical and cutting edge solutions to recycling, toxicity and biodegradability.”

Next it is just a matter of taking action to break our love affair with plastic.

How this affects you?

Health

The burning of plastic is known to emit dioxins. Even when incineration plants are legally required to filter emissions, pollution control equipment can remove some but not all of the toxins and toxic ash that result.
(As most of us know, these days even the use of plastic has begun to cause serious health concerns, particularly for children, who are more sensitive. Two chemicals, phthalates and bisphenol A, are being scrutinized recently as possible environmental toxins, carcinogens and endocrine disruptors, which mimic estrogens.)

Money

Green business innovation like this is exciting because it offers a product that makes good business sense for companies and small communities (and hopefully someday homes), who save money and make use of something that would otherwise go to waste.

Lifestyle

We too must begin to look at plastic the way Akinori Ito teaches children to think of it — as something valuable. With finite fossil fuels in mind, can we really fathom putting plastic in the garbage the way we used to? Beginning to think differently about the things we have learned to blindly consume will help us transition to a life that is more in tune with the planet and the realities ahead.

About the author

Since receiving her journalism degree some 13 years ago, Carol Smith has held various communications-related posts. These include coordinating for the editorial team at the Commission for Environmental Cooperation in her hometown of Montreal. Upon her husband’s job transfer to Tokyo, she happily landed in the UNU Media Studio, eager to quench a longtime wish to help promote sustainable living.
This story has been published under a Creative Commons license. To view the full legal license click the banner below.

You are free:

  •  

    to Share - to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work

  •  

    to Remix - to make derivative works

Under the following conditions:

  •  

    Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

  •  

    Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.

  •  

    Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

  • Just noticed that David de Rothschild is making a boat from waste plastic to sail to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
    http://www.twilightearth.com/2009/04/the-plasti...

    Hope it wakes a few more people up to the problems we are creating.
    http://www.adventureecology.com/theplastiki/
  • Great idea. I have been looking forward to this day for about a year. Actually, when I first moved in to my current house I was wondering what to do with the plastic waste. I was sure there was or must be a way to recycle it. I worry about the fumes though. Oil is not the only byproduct right?
    Also, I hate to think what the oil companies have to say about this... anyway I would consider buying a machine. I wonder about the energy costs to heat the plastic too.
  • David
    Hi Charlie,

    About the energy cost, I think it depends on each country. Here in Japan, it is cheaper than buying a liter of oil on a regular gas station.
    About the fumes, the machine does release methane gas, but that will be addressed in the next model. There are no dioxins coming out if you are worried about that.
  • Phil
    "Next it is just a matter of taking action to break our love affair with plastic."
    Just think how wide-ranging and useful plastic products are: it will be far more difficult to wean ourselves off plastics than off oil. There's not likely to be a break-up in the love affair for quite some time; but perhaps we could see to it that there is responsibility in this affair. In fact we need to love plastic more and see it, as Ito is doing, as something that we have a responsibility for: we have to 'make an honest woman' of it. An inspiring little article: thank you.
  • Niek Milder
    Amazing, realy re using "waste". I am intrigued can someone link / mail me that man's email or contact information. I want to make a photographic serie about such a facinating and inspiring person.
  • Austin
    This machine is a great way of demonstrating the value of plastic waste and will hopefully become more widely recognised around the world.

    However, I hope that the availability of such a machine won't delay the development of electric cars and renewable energy generation now that people know that plastic can so easily be converted back to oil for such purposes. The trouble with oil is that once it's burned, it's gone for good. At least as a plastic, it can be recycled into new plastic products again and again. I can see this machine being most useful for breaking down those hard-to-recycle plastics back into oil, which could then potentially be used to create new plastic products. Meanwhile, ideally our cars should be electric - recharged using renewable energy. I realise this won't happen overnight, but I think it's important not to lose sight of that goal. We have to stop burning oil for transport and power generation.
  • Phil: You're so right, it's more of a matter of finding respect for plastic rather than thinking we can just blow it off after a short-term fling.

    Niek, you could write to Ito-san via Blest's contact e-mail: info@blest.co.jp

    Austin: Thanks for your comments.
  • In many districts in Tokyo, plastics are burned at incinerators.
    Last year local governments changed the legislation and plastics and organic waste are incinerated all together. It's really crazy if you see the amount of my weekly trash, more than 50% is plastics!, why not implement Itou-san's machine for all the city! I feel terrible when i see all that trash, knowing that could be converted into something useful again.

    Now in the case of my country Mexico where the government announced our biggest Oils reserves will over in 7 years, we will need this kind of machine to keep the country moving and in peace... and we are not running out of plastic trash...
  • Mani Otto
    Thank you for this amazing video about a great man.

    The plastic-to-oil converter could also help reduce the amount of illegal plastic dumping into the oceans.

    I worked on a cruise ship that went around the world. There are designated ocean dump sites like landfills. Although international treaties ban dumping of all forms of plastic, a lot of plastic is still being dumped everyday. This is especially true for large cruise ships with thousands of passengers and crew generating enormous amounts of waste. A cruise ship would be a perfect place for implementing the Blest converter, if the oil can be refined to be used as ship fuel efficiently.

    Plastic takes 450 years to dissolve at sea.
    http://www.imo.org/Environment/mainframe.asp?to...
  • Mark Notaras
    Here is another similar machine.

    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12141
  • Carol_S
    Today, on World Ocean's Day, UNEP is calling for a ban on plastic bags as they release a report detailing how a growing tide of marine litter is harming oceans and beaches worldwide:

    http://tinyurl.com/n8n9uv
  • Anonymous
    When I first saw this post, I though, ‘that’s great – look at this. How simple a concept: getting oil from plastic. Wonderful’

    Anyone can be forgiven for craving the hope that could be gained by the validity of this story. It presents one man and his invention (and his newly-awakened concerns about the environment) which really must be questioned. It's a very emotive and uneasy topic for anyone to take in: there’s very substantial (and scientifically verifiable) evidence that particles of plastic outnumber particles of plankton in very sensitive marine areas in several oceans. It’s understandable to want some good news in light of these undeniable facts.

    Both this video and article need clarification and fact checking. Who is Blest Company? Are they controlled or owned by a ‘parent’ company? Has any independent scientific journal, organisation or laboratory confirmed that this machine actually does what the video implies (or, even states in no uncertain terms) that it can do?

    It’s more rational than cynical to question this. The use of recylced plastics in the new manufacture of non recyclable plastics is old (and rather sad) news. This requires liquified plastics (some of it may be recycled) for new injection mouldings or for clothing fabrication. It’s needed to make new PVC plumbing pipes, window frames and polartec fleece, amongst other popular items. PVC doesn’t currently have a great environmental record, btw (http://archive.greenpeace.org/toxics/html/conte...).

    This video states the plastic ‘oil’ this machine generates can be used for heating or other alternative uses, perhaps even to make petrol or diesel, which may be theoretically possible, but also quite expensive. It’s more profitable, it should have been added, to sell this plastic ‘oil’ on to others to make new plastic, vinyl and fabric products, like tents, clocks, rain gutters, pens and disposable razors. It’s a fact that there are many, many factories all over southeast Asia and China ready and willing to buy this material. Someone should have checked if Blest Company sells this valuable plastic ‘oil’ on to these companies – it’s very likely they do.

    If this story’s noble claims are accurate (and it’s not an exaggeration of a common process used to prepare plastics for use in new moulds), why wouldn’t the BBC or any other worldwide new services have reported this story, which ‘broke’ as long ago as 2007? (http://www.japancorp.net/Article.asp?Art_ID=14962) Why is the man in this video only shown with this machine in impoverished countries, and not in The Netherlands, Norway, Austria, Canada, the UK or the US?

    Many, many questions are left unanswered – or even asked. Based on what’s written and shown in this video, facts about this machine are sorely lacking. If a stronger case can be made for this company and its product, please do so – or post a retraction of this online recommendation which apparently is offered without the benefit of any credible independent testing or verification. Offer these much-needed details, please – and this may be good news.
  • Dear anonymous,

    Thanks for your excellent and insightful comments.
    Blest is just one example, from a number around the world, of a small company that has developed technology to convert plastic to oil. It has already been reported on in the international media. I recall watching a television report about Blest on BBC World News in 2008 by Chris Hogg at the time of the G8 Toyoko Summit. There is also a July 2007 article on Treehugger with an accompanying video from DIGINFO that I recommend you watch http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/07/making_....
    There are other oil to plastics machines as reported in the New Scientist (http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12141) and again in Treehugger (http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/09/plastic...). The pros and cons are discussed here (http://www.fakeplasticfish.com/2009/03/plastic-...).
    I appreciate that these technologies, in environmental terms, are an intermediate solution. To learn more about the scale of the problem and some other solutions, I recommend you watch the “Addicted to Plastic” documentary.
    From an environmental perspective, the best choice would be to reduce plastic at source. This would certainly prevent further aggravation of the problems in our oceans, again see link to Capt. Charles Moore presentation on TED for more on this.
    But a ban on plastic is not happening yet and there is still the issue of what we do with all the plastic that is already out there.
    What is interesting about the Blest story is the way that the main character uses the machine to teach (in Japan and elsewhere) that plastic is not waste, but a resource that can be reused. In Japan, a large amount of plastic is recycled (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recycling_in_Japan) into a range of products. However, even more is actually disposed of through incineration. The plastics to oil technology offers yet another option.
  • I have to say that I agree with anonymous here. We need to know also what kind of energy is used up in creating the oil from the plastics too. What other by-products are produced?

    Frequently in "green media" we see a tendency toward adjectives when numbers are a more sober way of describing what the product really does. In the video we learn that this machine would "make [Japan's] CO2 emissions much lower." What does that mean? Are you calculating the energy of the machine only? Or the transportation cost of both the plastics AND the machine? What about the total amount of energy consumed in making the oil from the plastic VS the energy created? If it takes more energy to create the oil than we get out of that oil then wtf good is this machine? They don't tell us that.

    I like that there's money being put toward developing solutions, but we need to know (objectively and quantitatively) that the "solution" has taken all of these questions into consideration and that in the grand scheme of sustainability, it does more good than harm.
  • BrendanBarrett
    Hi Jeff,

    Thanks for your feed back.

    The central problem appears to be two-fold. First, we discard vast amounts of plastic on a daily basis, and in places like Japan a lot of that plastic is incinerated. It can also be recycled (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recycling_in_Japan) which is a good thing (I hope you agree).

    Second, oil has to be transported from distant countries and requires a huge infrastructure that generates its own carbon footprint, so it could be argued that this footprint should be considered in some way. But we don't. Do you think we should know these figures as well?

    Recycling plastics to oil in the view of Akinori Ito of Blest, is one way to respond to both of the above issues. He believes that the technology can be particularly effective in a small island or developing country context.

    For more data on the process, I would encourage you to visit the Blest website and perhaps use something like Google translation tools. Here is a link to Blest and their QandA - http://www.blest.co.jp/s-5.html

    From what I can see on the website, to turn 1kg of plastic into oil requires 650Wh of electricity. For 1kg of plastic, one liter of oil is produced.

    It is still early days for this kind of technology and you are correct to point out that we need to look carefully at such solutions within the grand scheme of sustainability.

    However, the same rigour needs to be applied to business as usual, but unfortunately it is not. That is why the story of plastics to oil is so interesting... it gets you thinking about how we use oil and plastics, about waste, and about being more efficient.
  • Hey Brendan,

    I agree with your analysis (thanks also for the links to the info) and I absolutely think that we should consider the carbon footprint of the oil transport and business as usual methods of delivering goods such as plastic and oil.

    My main question for anyone considering this machine as a potential solution is, and I mean it constructively, is this machine the BEST way to deal with the plastic we currently waste?

    Would any of those plastic containers that we see being melted down be better served to be used again in their same form? Are their other means of recycling them (like into park benches or nylon fabric) and how much energy are these other methods going to cost?

    I highly recommend a book called "Without The Hot Air" by David MacKay www.withouthotair.com for a sense of the framework of empirical evidence that I'm trying to ask for here.

    As you said in your earlier comment the best action, broadly speaking, is to reduce our consumption. Perhaps that is outside the purview of the video, but that's precisely the difficulty I have with "green media." It tends to emphasize buying our way out of the environmental and energy problems we have instead of focusing on reducing our consumption. Understandably, most people don't want to hear about using less and most funding for projects ultimately comes from corporations that need to sell new products. Yet as MacKay's book suggests its much easier to take fewer flights and buy less "stuff" than it is to cover 10% of the Earth's landmass with solar cells.

    Anyway, based on http://bioenergy.ornl.gov/papers/misc/energy_co... looking at the listing of petrol diesel we see 1 Barrel of Oil = 1700 kWh energy. Convert that to litres (159 litres per barrel) we find that one litre of diesel produces approximately 11 kWh = 11000 Wh which is GREATER than the 650 Wh of electricity that is needed for this Blest oil producing machine. So in the end, the benefit is a little more than 10000 Wh! This is good news and it's precisely what I wish they had stated in the video. Of course we should mention that I'm assuming that the bioenergy website is correct and we're not factoring any conversions (from electric energy to mechanical energy or chemical energy) into this back-of-the-napkin estimate. At least we know that the machine converts more energy from plastic than it uses.

    Is there anything else that works better?

    Thanks,
    Jeff
  • claire
    what a great idea!..how i wish it would be adapted a.s.a.p so we can save our mother earth from global warming..(",)may this be acknowledge by the government administrators and private sectors..a positive feedback to this is really a great challenge.!.
  • mthomas1
  • hille
    I wish so much luck with this device. I really hope it works and we can deal with waste like that! Best of luck from Estonia!
  • samuelmiller
    Great work! We are doing our own thing with the plastic www.bombasticplastix.com
  • jameseoff
    I have been working in Oil and Gas fields for over 20 years. I have worked in well over a dozen 'developing' countries.
    I do everything possible to encourage alternative solutions to energy problems because of what I see.
    You have to spend time in 'developing' countries to understand why the video is set in developing countries. Spend a week in Lagos, Nigeria. Plastic trash is everywhere. DItto in Angolo and South Africa. Not as bad but still present in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Malaysia.
    The key element to a machine like this is taking a waste stream and converting it into something that is usable. Which in someplace like West Africa could make a HUGE enviromental impact.
    The other key thing about this company is they are trying to educate about reducing waste. This is a mentality that doesnt exist in many parts of the world.
    As a fellow engineer, I understand what this company is trying to do. Those of you who are so skeptical, should study the basic chemistry involved (which is actually very sound and feasible), before you pass judgement about if it is too good to be true or not. Just like the founder of the company would want you to do, educate yourself.

    - James

    PS here is how you know someone is behind what he says:
    Here is my E-mail Address: JamesEoff@yahoo.com
blog comments powered by Disqus