Photo by Google Maps

Climate

Lake Chad has literally gone from being an oasis in the desert, to being just desert.

Spanning the countries of Chad, Nigeria, Niger and Cameroon and bordering the Sahara desert, Lake Chad has contracted by a massive 95% between 1963 and 2001.

Lake Chad 1972/2007Source: UNEP Atlas of Our Changing Environment

Some stunning satellite images from NASA and compelling time-series video from Circle of Blue demonstrate the rapid decline of what was formerly the world’s 6th largest lake.

According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), about half of the shrinkage of the traditionally shallow Lake Chad has been caused by climatic changes, and the other half by high demand for agricultural water.

Poor human management through overgrazing and unsustainable irrigation has resulted in the replacement of natural vegetation with invasive plant species (now covering 50% of the lake), deforestation and the drying of the climate.

Add water and stir

It is critical that global environmental discussions integrate climatic and conflict challenges in developing countries. The Intergovernmental Panel and Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report on “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability” identifies the links between climate change and conflict, including in its Africa chapter.

In fact, as early as 1991, Thomas Homer-Dixon (and other peace and conflict experts) predicted future links between climate change and conflict in places like Lake Chad:

“Future wars and civil violence will often arise from scarcities of resources such as water, forests, fish…” (from On the Threshold: Environmental Changes as Causes of Acute Conflict.)

Water, the lifeblood of Lake Chad’s 20 million beneficiaries, can also be the potential lubricant for future conflict. Water scarcity, intensified by climate change, completes a conflict cocktail that includes surging populations, the spread of disease, oppression and corruption.

Sadly, across Africa, there are many declining shared water sources. The Zambezi River basin, which stretches across 8 countries in Southern Africa — Angola, Botswana, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Zambia, Tanzania and Zimbabwe — has lost a significant portion of its fresh water due to pollution and poor management.

Variations in the size of the Okavango River, shared by Botswana and Namibia,  have already almost led to military confrontation between the two countries.

Don’t mention the World Water Wars

If you think that these problems are only surfacing in Africa, think again. A new movie — Blue Gold: World Water Wars — screened at the Environmental Film Festival in Washington DC to coincide with United Nations World Water Day on 22 March, highlights how freshwater stocks are drying up all over the world.

Not surprisingly, one of the aims of the 5th World Water Forum, held last week in Istanbul, Turkey, is to raise the profile of water on the political agenda. Only by first stimulating serious awareness amongst the general population can one of the forum’s other aims, generating political commitment, be achievable.

Leading activist Maude Barlow is co-founder of the Blue Planet Project, UN senior water advisor and author of the landmark Blue Gold and Blue Covenant books.

She describes the global water crises as a battle between multinational corporations and international institutions on one hand (including “parts of the UN” such as UNESCO), and a global water justice movement on the other.

For the former, water is an “economic good”, which some are exploiting as an increasingly profitable financial investment; for the latter, access to clean water is everybody’s human right, but not one that everybody enjoys.

However, the real crux of the problem around Lake Chad, or anywhere else, lies in this key contradiction. Free or cheap access to water has led to unsustainable use and permanent damage to water supplies. At the same time, pricing water according to the “market”, which in theory leads to more efficient use, has come at the expense of those who can least afford it. We found a thought provoking discussion about this on the Aguanomics Blog.

Clearly, the principles of both equity and efficiency need to be followed so that future generations will have water to drink.

Navigating ahead

Going against the tide of popular opinion, four researchers from the International Peace Research Institute in Oslo (PRIO) argue that the links between climate change and conflict have “rarely been substantiated with reliable evidence”.

Historically, in relation to cross-border water management, cooperation is more common than conflict. According to the UN, over the last 60 years, there have been 37 cases of reported violence between states over water, in comparison to over 200 international agreements. In fact, formerly hostile neighbors Botswana and Namibia have joined forces to share the Okavango.

Appropriately for Lake Chad, the theme for 2009 World Water Day is “Transboundary waters: sharing water, sharing opportunities”.

Experts say that any answer lies in “better governance” at global, regional and local levels. The five member nations of the Lake Chad Basin Commission, the body that aims to regulate the use of the Basin’s remaining natural wealth, require more active support from international institutions like the UN.

In addition, all businesses operating in the area, whether multinational corporations or small-scale farmers, should be “green” and abide by the precautionary principle.

There is some hope that long term plans to divert abundant water from the nearby Congo river can replenish Lake Chad. In addition, yet-to-be-exploited underground aquifers can lead to a so-called “groundwater revolution”.

Yet, even if these lifelines were to materialize, the same mistakes relating to sustainable management could easily be made again. In the absence of local solutions to address extreme poverty in the region, top-down approaches will not succeed.

At current rates of decline, communities whose basic livelihoods are threatened will have no choice but to move beyond their traditional lands. Who could blame them?

There is still a chance that from a literal desert, an oasis of hope may spring. If not, Lake Chad, might be history — history worth learning from.

See the Blue Gold: Word Water Wars website for details of screenings in your country.

How this affects you?

Health

One billion people worldwide already lack access to clean water. Increasing populations will lead to increases in global competition for fresh water. None of us can take the quality of our drinking water for granted. We have to ensure that governments are not pressured to open up remaining freshwater resources to polluting industries.

Money

Presently, water is cheap, especially for those who can access good quality drinking water anytime they want. During World Water week (March 22 to 28, 2009), UNICEF’s Tap Project encourages drinkers in many cities worldwide to donate a small amount (e.g., US$1) per glass of water normally enjoyed for free in participating restaurants. Donations go towards efforts to provide clean and accessible water to children around the world.

Lifestyle

Two words: “save water”. The global fresh water crisis is exactly that — global. Even some of the most affluent areas of the world, such as the West Coast of the United States, are suffering from serious water stress. First of all, find out what your water footprint is at www.waterfootprint.org. Then, start taking shorter showers, reusing washing water, capturing rainwater and preventing tap leaks. For more simple tips on adjusting your lifestyle, see the Live section at www.eartheasy.com.

About the authors

Obijiofor Aginam

Dr. Obijiofor Aginam is an Academic Programme Officer and Director of Studies on Policy and Institutional Frameworks for the United Nations University Institute for Sustainability and Peace (ISP). He is a Nigerian whose specializations include global environmental and health governance and Third World Approaches to international law. He is currently researching the challenges of sustainable development and peace in Africa.

Mark Notaras

Mark Notaras is a writer/editor for the United Nations University Media Studio and a researcher for the UNU's Institute for Sustainability and Peace. He holds a Masters in International Affairs (Specialising in Peace and Conflicts Studies) from the Australian National University and has previously managed the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) Vietnam Programme. He is passionate about using web 2.0 tools for international cooperation and encouraging global youth to work together to address social and environmental injustices.
This story has been published under a Creative Commons license. To view the full legal license click the banner below.

You are free:

  •  

    to Share - to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work

  •  

    to Remix - to make derivative works

Under the following conditions:

  •  

    Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

  •  

    Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.

  •  

    Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

  • Stephen Klaber
    The invasive plant species that are dominating the lake and its whole basin are the real main problem. Typha Australis is sucking Africa dry. The plant is a dessication machine. It is also a champion producer of biomass, all of which can be made into fuel (ethanol or charcoal), and much of it fit for human consumption as well. The plant's habit of collecting pollutants means caution is needed for its use as food. Clearing this plant from Lake Chad and its tributaries, removing the soil it has built up and deposited so as to restore proper stream and lake beds, using that recovered soil to rehabilitate desert land, and profiting from the biomass is the way to save this lake.
  • Malcolm Meyer
    Aginam and Notaras argue that "free or cheap access to water has led to unsustainable use and permanent damage to water supplies". Really? Or is it the case that as our world has plodded along on its linear development path, the political elite under western guidance have dammed, drained and eroded the free and cheap access to water that has supplied peasant communities for thousands of years? The authors are right to mention the socio-economic forces at work that seek to gain from UN Millennium goals for example, but the crux is not free and cheap access to clean water alone. It is how we can go about creating a more equitable means of water distribution and achieve economic prosperity at the same time. The two are not mutually exclusive; rather they must be inclusive if peasants and politicians alike are to enjoy the benefits of clean water and a prosperous environment for generations to come.
  • Mark Notaras
    Thanks for your comments on this – both very good points. Here is a useful link on Typha Australis – its impacts and uses.

    http://www2.gtz.de/hep/english/e10a.htm

    To Malcolm Meyer: I agree that there has been western influence and pressures behind those countries – do you have any more specific examples to share with our readers on that eg which countries and in relation to what industries? Coupled with external pressures have been the overall failure of internal governance in those countries, either individually or through the Lake Chad Basin Commission to ensure the lake’s long term sustainability. So where does that leave us for the future, with rapidly increasing populations? How can go about ensuring both economic prosperity and equitable distribution of limited water resources, as you say?
blog comments powered by Disqus