It’s long been known which countries emit the most carbon dioxide, and thus contribute the most to climate change. But what about the carbon emissions of individual people in those countries?
On Wednesday, British charity Oxfam released a study that found the richest 10 percent of people produce half of the planet’s individual-consumption-based fossil fuel emissions, while the poorest 50 percent — about 3.5 billion people — contribute only 10 percent. Yet those same 3.5 billion people are “living overwhelmingly in the countries most vulnerable to climate change,” according to the report. According to the data used by the report, individual consumption — as opposed to consumption by governments and international transport — makes up 64 percent of worldwide climate emissions.
Oxfam estimates that the world’s richest 10 percent of people have carbon footprints that are 60 times higher as the poorest 10 percent. Any estimation that generalizes large populations is difficult to make, but researchers at Oxfam also estimate that the emissions of the world’s richest 1 percent create an even larger emissions gap: the 1 percent could emit 30 times more than the poorest 50 percent and 175 times more than the poorest 10 percent.

CREDIT: Oxfam
A 2013 assessment found that many low-income countries are experiencing (and will continue to experience as the climate changes) sea level rise, higher temperatures, unpredictable rainfall, and other extreme weather events. This, coupled with the Oxfam data, means that the people who are most vulnerable to the threats of climate change are also the least responsible for causing it. Researchers at Oxfam concluded that “climate change and economic inequality are inextricably linked.”
“[Climate change] is a crisis driven by the ‘haves’, which hits the ‘havenots’ the hardest,” the report states. “If there is to be any justice in the deal in Paris, governments must deliver something for the have-nots, wherever they live.”
There is no doubt that reaching an agreement between richer and poorer nations during the Paris climate talks, which began on Monday, will not be simple. Differentiation — or what obligation each country has towards fighting climate change — has been a divisive issue among developed and developing nations. Developing countries say that they shouldn’t have as big of an obligation to cut back emissions as developed countries, which have been able to emit carbon for many decades. However, some developed countries point to the danger of allowing countries that aren’t as developed as the the U.S. and other western nations, but which are still major emitters, to keep emitting without major commitments to scale back their carbon output.
Earlier this year, Pope Francis mentioned in his 2015 Papal Encyclical the “rich countries” whose pollution is affecting poor nations.
“The warming caused by the enormous consumption of some wealthy nations has repercussions in the poorest places on the planet… already we have exceeded certain limits of exploiting the planet, without solving the problem of poverty,” he wrote.
The Paris climate talks will conclude on December 11, with the hopes of an international climate agreement being reached.
This Climate Progress article appears with permission.
Join the Discussion
Pingback: What Should We Worry About? – R. W. Richey()
Pingback: Don’t Blame the Oil Men | Dan Devins()
Pingback: Bramble Cay Melomys - Nassau Weekly()
Pingback: It’s the Stupid Economy – 10 Minutes of Words()
Pingback: British Royal Family Become Surprising Champions for Alternative Energy - Sustainable News()
Pingback: British Royal Family Become Surprising Champions for Alternative Energy – Oil Market Analysis News()
Pingback: British Royal Family Become Surprising Champions for Alternative Energy | ElectriCache()
Pingback: Carbon footprints & wildfires | Ideas from Brussels and York | Brussels Blog()
Pingback: Lars Koch: Klimakrisen er skabt af rige mennesker i rige lande. Vi må betale for udviklingslandeudviklingslandes grønne omstilling « RÆSON()
Pingback: Nothing to See Here… Hand me Some more of those 100 Dollar Bills – The Road Less Traveled()
Pingback: ClimateYou – Why Does It Seem Rich People Don’t Care About Climate Change? by City Tech Blogger Marc-Kendy Voltaire()
Pingback: Myths about climate change - UrjaKhabar()
Pingback: A hope for climate change, or mostly despair? | Evie’s Blog()
Pingback: A disregard for human suffering – Climate for the 99%()
Pingback: COP won’t address climate change, but maybe the people protesting it can – Climate for the 99%()
Pingback: SoftMachine.net | Why we should be wary of blaming ‘overpopulation’ for the climate crisis()
Pingback: Why we should be wary of blaming ‘overpopulation’ for the climate crisis – Enjeux énergies et environnement()
Pingback: Why we should be wary of blaming ‘overpopulation’ for the climate crisis – Enjeux énergies et environnement()
Pingback: Why we ought to be cautious of blaming 'overpopulation' for the local weather disaster | News230()
Pingback: Heather Alberro - Why we should be Wary of Blaming 'Overpopulation' for the Climate Crisis | Brave New Europe()
Pingback: The Climate Crisis Is About Right and Wrong - Ranzware Tech NEWS()
Pingback: The Climate Crisis Is About Right And Wrong | Gizmodo Australia()
Pingback: The Climate Crisis Is About Right and Wrong | Latest Media News()
Pingback: Why we should be wary of blaming ‘overpopulation’ for the climate crisis | Acclimatise – Building climate resilience()
Pingback: The Climate Crisis Is About Right and Wrong - Gr3ta()
Pingback: At the Davos Economic forum, Jane Godall and Al Gore said inequality is to blame for climate chang – Enjeux énergies et environnement()
Pingback: Why we should be wary of blaming ‘overpopulation’ for the climate crisis – Dr. Rich Swier()
Pingback: Fact: Overpopulation Did Not Cause Climate Change - taktik(z) Staging()
Pingback: An island of refuge? Ireland's political parties and 'Fortress Europe' - The City()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos climate change philanthropy has quite a few (hidden) strings attached – IM Caribbean()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos climate change philanthropy has quite a few (hidden) strings attached – CBD News24()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos climate change philanthropy has quite a few (hidden) strings attached – Mlobi News Network()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos’ philanthropy highlights just how much trouble we’re really in – Newsnaut()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos’ climate change philanthropy has quite a few (hidden) strings attached – Smart2buy()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos’ philanthropy highlights just how much trouble we’re really in – Wacky News()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos’ philanthropy highlights just how much trouble we’re really in()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos' philanthropy highlights just how much trouble we're really in - The Trump Years()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos' climate change philanthropy has quite a few (hidden) strings attached - Best Trump Memes Website Ever()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos’ philanthropy highlights just how much trouble we’re really in ǀ View | Stop Plastic Waste Now!()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos' philanthropy highlights just how much trouble we're really in ǀ View - Enewsgate()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos' philanthropy highlights just how much trouble we're really in ǀ View - World2day()
Pingback: La filantropía de Jeff Bezos resalta en cuántos problemas estamos realmente really Ver | Heaven32()
Pingback: Jeff Bezos’ philanthropy highlights just how much trouble we’re really in ǀ View | TheTop10News()
Pingback: Why we should be wary of blaming 'overpopulation' for the climate crisis - Mercatornet()
Pingback: Why billionaire climate philanthropists will always be part of the problem – Enjeux énergies et environnement()
Pingback: Heather Alberro - Why Billionaire Climate Philanthropists Will Always be Part of the Problem | Brave New Europe()
Pingback: Why billionaire climate philanthropists will always be part of the problem – Impact 360 Directory()
Pingback: SoftMachine.net | Why billionaire climate philanthropists will always be part of the problem()
Pingback: Why Billionaire Climate Philanthropists Will Always Be Part of the Problem()
Pingback: Why Billionaire Climate Philanthropists Will Always Be Part of the Problem ~ cleanenergyconnection.com()
Pingback: Why billionaire climate philanthropists will always be part of the problem()
Pingback: The iconoclast: Why billionaire climate philanthropists will always be part of the problem - 17 Global Goals()
Pingback: Eco-Fascism and COVID-19 - Honi Soit()
Pingback: Filantrópicos Bilionários São Parte do Problema, Não da Solução • modefica()
Pingback: Debunking ‘overpopulation’ – Enjeux énergies et environnement()
Pingback: Indian Open Minds - क्लाईमेट चेंज को कल्याणकारी योजना के दायरे में लाने की ज़रूर()
Pingback: The Emissions of Private Jets & Why It’s Time For A Carbon Tax – ETHICAL UNICORN()
Pingback: Debunking ‘overpopulation’ – The Ecologist – The Last and Final days()
Pingback: Interlúdio: pensando um mundo pós-crise()
Pingback: Week Ten — Climate Change Part 2: Green Capitalism – kate glavan()
Pingback: Deeper Than Diversity – Reflections on Systemic Racism in and Outside of Schools()
Pingback: Geen belasting meer op leven, maar op vervuilen | SchipholWatch()
Pingback: Democrats are blowing it on climate – THROUGH.()
Pingback: Why Does It Seem Rich People Don’t Care About Climate Change? – ClimateYou()
Pingback: Economic Sustainability | 4 financial fundamentals of a greener world - verdant adventures()