E-learning Not to Fly

Not too long ago, Our World 2.0 guest writer Jonathan Wright, a farmer from the appropriately named Canadian town of Carbon, suggested that “education” in itself is not reason enough to fly. In his opinion piece “Kicking the travel drug”,  Wright writes that:

“Increasingly among my peers, the stated argument for spending so much time traveling is education. I admit that this sounds legitimate at first utterance, but I am then tempted to be glib and ask why it is that, with more folks traveling more easily, we seem more intensely ignorant than ever of the most significant details affecting life on earth?”

Wright, along with prominent campaigners like Rob Hopkins, the founder of the UK’s transition towns network, have given up the travel drug and operate from their own no-fly zones. On the other hand, other climate change campaigners justify flying in the name of the cause to spread awareness on climate change. These “justiflyers” include Al Gore and Dr. Rajendra Pachauri of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and Franny Armstrong, Director of the Age of Stupid. They and others involved in climate change research, policy making and advocacy have received criticism for not always walking the talk.

For the United Nations University including the Media Studio, which produces content for Our World 2.0, our mandate is to educate the global public about what is going on in the world. And in doing so, whether it is in accepting students through our courses, partnering with research institutions from around the world or developing educational films and articles for this website, the UNU is responsible for its fair share of emissions from flying. We have to be honest with ourselves and admit that this is a certain irony, given that many of our initiatives relate to climate change. So what to do?

Learning to e-learn

If we accept that — for the UNU or other educational and advocacy institutions  —  international travel can indeed be necessary to achieving valid goals, then the question therefore becomes how to be smart flyers who choose carefully when, to where and for what purposes they fly.

Obvious first steps to changing our aviation habits include avoiding trips to shorter meetings or to far-away locations, and instead taking up opportunities to utilise modern technologies, such as video conferencing and Skype hookups.

Although video conferencing might appear to be expensive to set up initially — with an entry level system costing around US$ 2,500 and a top of the line system around US$ 20,000 — like efficient lighting or a good education, it’s a wise investment that pays dividends in the long term. That would be equivalent to a couple of those around-the-world business class air tickets. Furthermore, it is fairly easy and intuitive to use and saves the weary traveller from hours of fun at the airport transfer lounge.

When it comes to providing education with a global flavour, e-learning provides the obvious win-win solution here. Although it has many definitions, e-learning is basically technology-enhanced learning, which is predominately online or web-based. Today, e-learning not only allows for the instant exchange of information across the world through web based learning management systems like Moodle, but with video conferencing technology, you can see, hear and speak to your counterparts in multiple locations in real time. That means that international learning and collaboration can still take place from the comfort of your own space.

Research in the UK has shown that distance learning and e-learning courses have a significantly smaller carbon and energy footprint than the traditional campus-based courses, and that is without the inclusion of students’ air travel between countries.

Asia-Pacific Initiative

The Asia-Pacific Initiative, of which the UNU is a member, is a leading example of a successful global e-learning initiative. Launched at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development by Professor Kimio Uno of Tokyo’s Keio University, the Initiative has evolved to include ten universities in Japan, the US, India, Indonesia, Thailand and Samoa.

The two semester-based courses (10 to 15 weeks) currently being offered are  Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance, and Climate Change, Energy and Food Security. There are currently 297 students enrolled in the 2009/10 fall/winter semester courses.

Student reaction to the use of video conferencing has been very positive. One student stated that:

“What is most important is having an opportunity to get in touch with other views and cultures by communicating with people from different countries across the world. We would make ourselves more open-minded through face-to-face interactive dialogue in the class over the video screen.”

And on the use of online learning another student stated:

“Moodle is a forum that has been developed to provide interaction between teachers and students beyond limited video conferencing time. This has been useful to know about teachers’ interests and their specialisation. ….

“Moreover this has been good for learning about peers as well. The resource material and different forums have enabled students to exchange their views and be informed about the latest developments. The purpose of teachers and students submission to Moodle must have been to allow them to know each other.”

The learning of the future

E-learning will play a key role in the UNU’s first ever graduate and PhD learning programs, to be held jointly with universities in Japan and other countries and scheduled to commence in 2010.

Admittedly, nothing substitutes for person-to-person contact. But looking into the future, as more and more people seek to fly, with less and less oil to burn in the world pushing up the price of flying, organisations will be under greater financial pressure to cut unnecessary costs, regardless of their response to climate change. The days of travelling  across the Atlantic to give a ten minute speech can be put behind us.

Connecting across the world through already functional energy and time efficient technologies like video-conferencing makes total sense. When it comes to the education of the next generation — including future leaders who will need to deal with the environmental challenges with which we leave them — a combination of video conferencing and e-learning is a perfect solution. Organisations and communities that build their own capacity to use a variety of e-learning tools will be well positioned for a future world.

Creative Commons License
E-learning Not To Fly by Mark Notaras is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION BELOW

Author

Mark Notaras was a writer/editor of Our World 2.0 for the United Nations University (UNU) Media Centre from 2009–2012. He is a former researcher in Peace and Security for the UNU Institute for Sustainability and Peace (UNU-ISP). He holds a Masters in International Affairs (Peace and Conflict Studies) from the Australian National University and the Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) and in 2013 completed a Rotary Peace Fellowship at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok. Currently Mark works in Timor-Leste advising local NGOs on community agriculture and conflict prevention projects.

Join the Discussion

  • http://aabdev.wordpress.com/ Fabio Pereira

    - Businesses do look at costs. It is not out of pleasure for oil consumption that they fly people around.
    - With so much smart people out there, stop moving can’t be the smartest solution. E-learning vs. face-to-face experience? Maybe in some extreme cases (as you say: atlantic for 10min speech). Other than that, no way! I am a student, I have flown hundreds of time, and I can’t think of one trip that could have been substituted by the sofa/online version…

    • BrendanBarrett

      Hi Fabio,
      I agree that businesses do focus on costs, especially now that we face economic hard ship. It is at these times when companies actually cut back on travel and use alternative cost effective measures like video conferencing. In fact, businesses that do not use video conferencing today are sadly well behind the curve and will fall back even further unless they get their act together.
      On the benefits of elearning versus face to face, you really have to try it and see. I have been involved in this area for the past ten years and the technology has advanced leaps and bounds. Once you begin to explore alternatives to travel, you find that travelling, especially for educational purposes, seems more of a nuisance than an actual benefit. But I guess this all boils down to personal preferences.